In a wide ranging interview to be aired this weekend on 60 Minutes, Supreme Court Justice Antonio Scalia defends his decision in the 2000 case Bush vs. Gore which effectively anointed George Bush as president. Scalia's answer to people who express continued concern over the wisdom of this decision: "Get over it. It's so old by now."
Really?
One wonders if Scalia would have the nads to tell the victims of Hurricane Katrina to get over his decision. A decision that led directly to significant loss of life across the gulf coast. Or how about telling it to the thousands of families who've sacrificed love ones in the president's misguided war.
In the end, why does Scalia care if the American public gets over his decision? Could it be continued questioning of the righteousness of Bush vs. Gore nags at his conscience? Unfortunately, that assumes he has one.
Friday, April 25, 2008
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Fake News: We Distort so You Don't Decide
Recently on Fake News (we only watch it on the You Tube), an anchor pushed a poll that reportedly showed John McCain beating the Democrats by between 9 to 17 points.
Wow! Stop the presses!
Why hasn't the mainstream media jumped all over this?
Well, probably because aaaaah. . . . it's not true.
You see in the Fake News poll, the republiCON voter has only Johnnie boy to choose from, thus the 35 percent. Yet, the Democrat vote is apparently split between Obama and Hillary.
Eventually one of the Democratic candidates will be eliminated, a la American Idol.
Anyway, assuming most good Democrats vote for the party nominee, the Democratic candidate actually pulls 44 percent of the vote in the Fake News poll.
So, the CONservatives at Fake News with a wave of their magic wand turned John's deficit into a lead.
Pretty impressive.
Maybe they will next turn their transformative power toward these troubling numbers.
Wow! Stop the presses!
Why hasn't the mainstream media jumped all over this?
Well, probably because aaaaah. . . . it's not true.
You see in the Fake News poll, the republiCON voter has only Johnnie boy to choose from, thus the 35 percent. Yet, the Democrat vote is apparently split between Obama and Hillary.
Eventually one of the Democratic candidates will be eliminated, a la American Idol.
Anyway, assuming most good Democrats vote for the party nominee, the Democratic candidate actually pulls 44 percent of the vote in the Fake News poll.
So, the CONservatives at Fake News with a wave of their magic wand turned John's deficit into a lead.
Pretty impressive.
Maybe they will next turn their transformative power toward these troubling numbers.
Monday, March 10, 2008
The High Cost of Rove's Stupid Statements
Karl Rove recently addressed a crowd at the University of Iowa. Rove who was reported to have receive $40,000 for his speech, got a less than warm response. At one point Rove confronted his hecklers saying "You got a chance to ask your questions later and make your stupid statements, let me make mine."
Say Whaa?
The University of Iowa probably hoped it would get more than Rove's stupid statements for its 40 grand. Yet, given the cost turd blossom's work has inflicted upon the country over the past decade, the UI probably feels it got off easy.
Say Whaa?
The University of Iowa probably hoped it would get more than Rove's stupid statements for its 40 grand. Yet, given the cost turd blossom's work has inflicted upon the country over the past decade, the UI probably feels it got off easy.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Still Not Safe? Department of WTF!
President Bush told a crowd of Homeland Security personnel recently, that despite their efforts these past five years the nation is still not safe.
Could it be this is Georgie's idea of a pep talk for Department of Homeland Security (DHS) personnel? Given his failing grasp of reality, probably so.
But thinking people will see this comment as nothing but a slap in the face of the dedicated public servants whose job it is to protect this nation.
Could it be this is Georgie's idea of a pep talk for Department of Homeland Security (DHS) personnel? Given his failing grasp of reality, probably so.
But thinking people will see this comment as nothing but a slap in the face of the dedicated public servants whose job it is to protect this nation.
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Senator McCain? A few questions please!
After his victory in Wisconsin, John McCain called out Senator Barak Obama, the likely Democratic presidential nominee. In a not so veiled smack at the Illinois Senator, McCain asked if America wants to "risk the confused leadership of an inexperienced candidate who once suggested invading our ally, Pakistan, and sitting down without pre-conditions or clear purpose with enemies who support terrorists and are intent on destabilizing the world by acquiring nuclear weapons?"
Fair question. One I'm sure Obama will be happy to answer in his upcoming debates with the republiCONS default nominee.
Yet, I'm certain Obama, as well as the rest of the American public will also have a few tough questions for McCain.
How about these for starters?
Does America want a President who uses enthic slurs? Or what does it tell us about the candidate's judgment who sees no problem with a hundred year war/occupation? Are voters comfortable with someone running the country who appears to have sold his soul in an attempt to win over the extreme right? Or does a man who once called Jerry Fallwell and his ilk the "agents of intolerance" only later to turn around and give a commencement address at the agent's University have the moral character to lead the nation?
We look forward to learning the answers.
Fair question. One I'm sure Obama will be happy to answer in his upcoming debates with the republiCONS default nominee.
Yet, I'm certain Obama, as well as the rest of the American public will also have a few tough questions for McCain.
How about these for starters?
Does America want a President who uses enthic slurs? Or what does it tell us about the candidate's judgment who sees no problem with a hundred year war/occupation? Are voters comfortable with someone running the country who appears to have sold his soul in an attempt to win over the extreme right? Or does a man who once called Jerry Fallwell and his ilk the "agents of intolerance" only later to turn around and give a commencement address at the agent's University have the moral character to lead the nation?
We look forward to learning the answers.
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Romney: Consistent to the End!
The night of Super Tuesday, Slick Mitt Romney promised a crowd of supporters "this campaign is going on!"
We now know going on meant for two more days.
At the CPAC conference, Romney annouced he is suspending his campaign. Stunned and shocked supporters let loose with cries of "no!"
Stunned? Shocked? Really?
Throughout his campaign, Slick changed positions on nearly every issue from abortion, gay rights, stem cell research to the environment.
Why would anyone be surprised Slick flip flopped on his decision to stay in the race? One can say this about Romney, he was a consistent chameleon to the end!
We now know going on meant for two more days.
At the CPAC conference, Romney annouced he is suspending his campaign. Stunned and shocked supporters let loose with cries of "no!"
Stunned? Shocked? Really?
Throughout his campaign, Slick changed positions on nearly every issue from abortion, gay rights, stem cell research to the environment.
Why would anyone be surprised Slick flip flopped on his decision to stay in the race? One can say this about Romney, he was a consistent chameleon to the end!
Sunday, February 3, 2008
McCain/Romney Ticket? NOT!
"Slick" Mitt Romney is stumping hard for Super Tuesday votes, yet must realize his multi-million dollar ego trip is quickly running out of steam. To keep his campaign on life support, Romney's reduced to aping criticism from CONservative voices like Rick Stantorum, Rush Limbaugh, Hugh Hewitt, and Lars Larson of front runner John McCain.
It's clear Romney shares these blowhards' assessment of John when he repeats the message that "We really can't afford John McCain as the nominee of our party." By implication though, Slick is also saying the country can't afford him as president.
Democrats couldn't agree more, and look forward to quoting Slick's take on John during the general election.
It's clear Romney shares these blowhards' assessment of John when he repeats the message that "We really can't afford John McCain as the nominee of our party." By implication though, Slick is also saying the country can't afford him as president.
Democrats couldn't agree more, and look forward to quoting Slick's take on John during the general election.
Labels:
2008,
conservative,
election,
McCain,
president,
republicons,
Romney,
rush limbaugh,
slick
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)